
Everybody who works with members of the public is at risk of violence, but there is strong evidence (Standing & Nicolini, 1997*) which shows that the highest risks of violence at work are associated with:
Dealing with the public
Providing care or advice
Working with confused older people
Working with those who have mental health problems
Alcohol or drug misuse
Working alone
Handling valuables or medication
Working with people under stress
* Standing H & Nicolini D (1997) Review of Workplace Related Violence, Tavistock Institute. HSE Books.
Employees most at risk are likely to be those who:
Aren't aware they are at risk and unprepared.
Haven't been trained in inter personal skills / personal safety
Are so overburdened with work that they can't always give clients their full attention
Have been victimised/ assaulted before
Work with others who have been assaulted before
Believe they have no option but to tolerate unsafe working conditions / don't know their Rights
Know they are at risk and understand - but are unwilling to assert - their Employment Rights
And, particularly, if they are working for an employer that:
Isn't committed to reducing the potential for violence to happen
Hasn't assigned a senior manager to be responsible/ accountable for ensuring adequate standards of protection against violence
Doesn't welcome reports of safety concerns
Doesn't invite, investigate and address reports of abuse, threats, assaults
Doesn't listen to the views of 'front line' employees
Defers making improvements that are needed
Hasn't made suitable provisions
The ‘real time’ that separates employees from the manpower support of colleagues/ security is crucial to preventing very serious injury outcomes. Home Office research shows that the close presence of other workers tends to inhibit assaults taking place, and the Review of Workplace Related Violence 1997 (Standing, H. and Nicolini, D. - HSE Books) presents powerful evidence to show that working alone or in isolation means a higher risk of sustaining serious injury in the event of an attack.
It's common sense really. If no-one can promptly help to stave off an attack then the severity of the consequences are potentially more serious.
Whilst being able to talk to a colleague on a radio or telephone may be comforting in a non emergency situation, in a crisis it may not be sufficient to ensure safety.
The increasing frequency of serious attacks on lone worker employees means that some jobs previously considered suitable to be carried out single-handed may now need to have one, two or even more colleagues either present or, very nearby in order to be considered legally safe to carry out.
Lone workers in small shops, petrol stations, Off Licences and kiosks are seen as easy targets. Cleaners, maintenance or repair staff and others who work alone outside normal hours are also at special risk of suffering physical and sexual attacks. However, of all lone workers, taxi drivers are at the greatest risk of violence.
Research by crime prevention agencies has shown that taxi drivers are up to 15 times more likely to be victims of violence than workers in other occupations. (Twenty-four cab drivers have been murdered in Britain in the last nine years.)